Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
J Butler. Cassell, 1999, £16.99, pp 248. ISBN 0304705829
This book is about scarcity and rationing in health care and the ethical questions they raise. It is based on the premise that if the aim of a responsible government is to balance the nation's varied claims upon the collective purse, then no government can be morally blamed for failing to remove the need of rationing from the National Health Service (NHS), and thus rationing as such cannot give rise to legitimate moral concerns. The question that needs to be addressed therefore is not whether rationing itself is unethical, or even whether any particular distribution mechanisms are unethical, but whether they are structured and work in morally acceptable ways, and lead to morally acceptable results.
In the first chapter Butler describes the gap between needs and resources. He describes what has been done (mainly) in the UK as a way of providing the background to the rationing debate. The second chapter addresses the moral …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Just health: replies and further thoughts
- The rationing debate: Rationing within the NHS should be explicit: The case for
- Not so special after all? Daniels and the social determinants of health
- Priority setting: learning to make tough decisions
- Age rationing and prudential lifespan account in Norman Daniels’ Just health
- Research for Health Justice: an ethical framework linking global health research to health equity
- The case against
- Integrating philosophy, policy and practice to create a just and fair health service
- Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice
- Bioethics and imagination: towards a narrative bioethics committed to social action and justice