Article info
PDFDebate
Arguments at cross-purposes: moral epistemology and medical ethics
- Correspondence to: Dr M Loughlin, Department of Humanities and Applied Social Studies, Manchester Metropolitan University, Alsager Campus, Hassall Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST7 2HL, UK; m.loughlin{at}mmu.ac.uk
Citation
Arguments at cross-purposes: moral epistemology and medical ethics
Publication history
- Accepted May 7, 2001
- Revised May 6, 2001
- First published February 1, 2002.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2002 by the Journals of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Principlism and communitarianism
- The transformation of (bio)ethics expertise in a world of ethical pluralism
- Methods and principles in biomedical ethics
- Deliberative ethics in a biomedical institution: an example of integration between science and ethics
- What is it to do good medical ethics? On the concepts of ‘good’ and ‘goodness’ in medical ethics
- Old problems in need of new (narrative) approaches? A young physician–bioethicist’s search for ethical guidance in the practice of physician-assisted dying in the Netherlands
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- Can bioethics be an honest way of making a living? A reflection on normativity, governance and expertise
- A waste of time: the problem of common morality in Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- Absent virtues: the poacher becomes gamekeeper