Article Text

Download PDFPDF
On the theory of individual health
  1. G Danzer,
  2. M Rose,
  3. M Walter,
  4. B F Klapp
  1. Clinic for Internal Medicine—Psychosomatics/Psychotherapy Charité, Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  1. Correspondence to:
 Dr Danzer, Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Psychosomatik-Psychotherapie Charité—Campus Mitte, Medizinische Fakultät der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Luisen-straβe 13a, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
 gerhard.danzer{at}charite.deCorrespondence to: PD Dr med Dr phil G Danzer; gerhard.danzer{at}charite.de

Abstract

On top of elaborate methods and approaches in research, diagnostics, and therapy, medicine is in need of a theory of its own thought and action; without theoretical reflection and referentiality, action becomes blind (and thus costly) and thought takes on a monotonous and circular character. Take the concept of health. The field of medicine, more and more taking its cues from evidence-based medicine (EBM), is onesidedly oriented to concepts of health which are based on notions of standard values for large populations or—in the shadow of the genome project—see health as the outcome of an intact genome, often turning a blind eye to the individual aspects of health. With an eye in particular to Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy, the present paper looks into some continental European theories of individual health, seeking to determine to what extent they can contribute to reducing medicine's theory deficit and what consequences this may have for research, diagnostics, and therapy.

  • Health
  • individual
  • medical anthropology
  • theory of medicine

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

Other content recommended for you