Article Text
Abstract
In the latest reform of the National Health Service great emphasis has been placed on the achievement and maintenance of quality. Mechanisms for ensuring this are being set up under the general title of “clinical governance”. What is the meaning of this term? The metaphor behind the phrase is of navigation through stormy seas, but who guides the helmsman? Clinical ethics committees could have a part to play in these changes, provided their role is properly understood. Clinical governance is concerned with management according to an agreed set of aims. The task of ethics committees is Socratic rather than managerial. They should ask fundamental questions about the ethical norms of the services provided and give critical appraisal of the moral character of institutional policies. If these tasks are carried out then governance may become a watchword rather than just another buzzword.
- Governance
- quality
- National Health Service (NHS)
- ethics committees
- Socratic method NHS
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Alastair Campbell, MA, BD, ThD, is Professor of Ethics in Medicine and Director of the Centre for Ethics in Medicine in the Medical School of the University of Bristol. He acts as an Ethics Consultant to the clinical ethics committee of the Royal United Hospitals Trust, Bath.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Implementing clinical governance in English primary care groups/trusts: reconciling quality improvement and quality assurance
- Clinical ethics support services in the UK: an investigation of the current provision of ethics support to health professionals in the UK
- Clinical governance and genitourinary medicine
- Snapshots of five clinical ethics committees in the UK
- Fifth report on the provision of services for patients with heart disease
- A model for clinical governance in primary care groups
- Clinical governance development: learning from the New Zealand experience
- Re-thinking accountability: trust versus confidence in medical practice
- Professional accountability in a changing world
- Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of clinical governance implementation: a qualitative New Zealand study of 3205 open-ended survey comments