rss
J Med Ethics 2001;27:388-392 doi:10.1136/jme.27.6.388
  • Equality and disability symposium

Disability matters in medical law

  1. Kate Diesfeld
  1. Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand

      Abstract

      The British Parliament stated that health services would be covered by the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (the act). However, when people with disabilities are at their most vulnerable, for example when in hospital or subject to medical procedures, the antidiscrimination law fails them. A review of cases indicates that when people with disabilities are subject to medical treatment, the legislative protections are allowed to vanish. Instead, medical decisions are justified on obscure notions such as “best interests”, often with irreversible or even terminal results. This article examines the relevant provisions and limitations of the act, the features of notable non-treatment decisions, and the act's potential to guide future decision making. It argues that antidiscrimination legislation should be assertively applied to protect vulnerable people.

      Footnotes

      • Kate Diesfeld, BA, Juris Doctorate, is Senior Lecturer and Assistant Director, National Centre for Health and Social Ethics, Faculty of Health Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

      Register for free content

      The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

      Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.