Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Since the last generation medical ethics has seen a remarkable shift from benign medical paternalism to patient rights and autonomy. Whereas once it might have been acceptable for doctors to decide, largely on their own, what was in the best interests of their patients, today senior health professionals are expected to make decisions jointly both with patients or their carers and with other health professionals. Patient autonomy and justice, and not simply beneficence, are usually thought to be crucial to medical ethics today.
Although I strongly support this shift in medical ethics, I believe it is important to recognise that it has some cost to medical professionals, to patients and even at times to the National Health Service (NHS). Medical paternalism, when it was genuinely benign, did have some benefits both for doctors and for their patients. Yet precisely because most of us are no longer prepared to be at the receiving end of such paternalism, these particular benefits are now largely lost to us.
The new joint statement, Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation,1 illustrates this point well. At the outset it admits that “health professionals are aware that decisions about attempting resuscitation raise very sensitive and potentially distressing issues for the patient and people emotionally close to the patient”. It was because of these sensitive and potentially distressing issues that it was once thought acceptable to make do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) (or DNR as it was then) orders without consulting either patients or their families and with the knowledge that the latter would probably never discover that such orders had ever been made. Now, however, health workers are warned frankly that they “should remember …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Including patients in resuscitation decisions in Switzerland: from doing more to doing better
- In what circumstances will a neonatologist decide a patient is not a resuscitation candidate?
- Factors affecting do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) decisions among adult patients in the emergency department of a general tertiary teaching hospital in China: a retrospective observational study
- Do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders: understanding and interpretation of their use in the hospitalised patient in Ireland. A brief report
- Offering older hospitalised patients the choice to die in their preferred place
- Improving rates of implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation in end-of-life care
- Guideline for the management of terminal haemorrhage in palliative care patients with advanced cancer discharged home for end-of-life care
- To what extent should older patients be included in decisions regarding their resuscitation status?
- Ethics briefings
- End of life care in the emergency department