Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
The context in which the British Medical Association (BMA) first considered publishing specific guidelines on decisions about attempting cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), in the early 1990s, needs to be remembered. At that time the subject was often seen as far too sensitive to be mentioned to patients. Many hospitals had no formal policy about how CPR decisions should be made, apart from an expectation that these were purely medical matters. Advance decision making about CPR, where it existed, appears to have been generally on an ad hoc basis by doctors. Patients, their relatives and the rest of the health care team were often unaware of it. After several cases in which nurses had been disciplined–unfairly in the eyes of some–for complying with their patients' known wishes about non-resuscitation in cases where no advance medical decision had been recorded, there was a demand for guidance.
The BMA was approached by nurses' representatives with a view to publishing some very basic advice. This advice, issued in 1993 jointly with the Royal College of Nursing, and in association with the Resuscitation Council, was under 1000 words. Whether this brevity reflects difficulties in achieving consensus or lower expectations about what was required is a matter for speculation. Throughout the 1990s the guidance was distributed widely and used as a basis for many hospitals' local policies. Recently, however, the demands on the BMA and other professional bodies for ethical advice have changed and grown. Discussion of sensitive decisions about potentially life-prolonging interventions is now …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: a joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing
- Who gets the ventilator? Important legal rights in a pandemic
- Disability matters in medical law
- Ethics briefing
- Human Rights Act 1998 and mental health legislation: implications for the management of mentally ill patients
- Potential impact of the Human Rights Act on psychiatric practice: the best of British values?
- An audit of “do not attempt resuscitation” decisions in two district general hospitals: do current guidelines need changing?
- Ethics briefings
- Variation in local trust Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) policies: a review of 48 English healthcare trusts
- Ethical problems in respiratory care: the role of the law