Article info
PDFEditorial
The best is the enemy of the good - can research ethics learn from rationing?
Citation
The best is the enemy of the good - can research ethics learn from rationing?
Publication history
- First published December 1, 2000.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2000 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics of undisclosed payments to doctors recruiting patients in clinical trials
- Should desperate volunteers be included in randomised controlled trials?
- Distinguishing treatment from research: a functional approach
- Randomised placebo-controlled trials of surgery: ethical analysis and guidelines
- Restraint in somatic healthcare: how should it be regulated?
- Drawing the line in clinical treatment of companion animals: recommendations from an ethics working party
- The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals
- Clinical trials in cardiovascular medicine: are we looking for statistical significance or clinical relevance?
- Is providing elective ventilation in the best interests of potential donors?
- Are antipsychotic drugs the right treatment for challenging behaviour in learning disability?: The place of a randomised trial