Article Text
Abstract
This pilot study explores the reasons patients have for refusing chemotherapy, and the ways oncologists respond to them. Our hypothesis, generated from interviews with patients and oncologists, is that an ethical approach that views a refusal as an autonomous choice, in which patients are informed about the pros and cons of treatment and have to decide by weighing them, is not sufficient. A different ethical approach is needed to deal with the various evaluations that play a role in treatment refusal. If patients forgo further treatment, while curative or palliative methods are available, there is no perspective from which to integrate the weighing of pros and cons of treatment and the preferences and values of individual cancer patients. A discrepancy thus results as regards what “good reasons” are, evoking misunderstandings or even breaking off communication. Suggestions are given for follow up research.
- Ethics
- oncology
- treatment refusal
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Marli Huijer, MD, MPh, PhD, is a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Faculty of Philosophy, Rijks University, Groningen, the Netherlands. Evert van Leeuwen, MPh, PhD, is Professor in Philosophy and Medical Ethics, the Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Physicians’ evaluations of patients’ decisions to refuse oncological treatment
- Physicians’ personal values in determining medical decision-making capacity: a survey study
- Disfigured anatomies and imperfect analogies: body integrity identity disorder and the supposed right to self-demanded amputation of healthy body parts
- Understanding provision of chemotherapy to patients with end stage cancer: qualitative interview study
- Cancer treatment refusal decisions in advanced cancer: a retrospective case–control study
- Comparing childhood leukaemia treatment before and after the introduction of a parental education programme in Indonesia
- Overriding competent medical treatment refusal by adolescents: when “no” means “no”
- Adolescent autonomy revisited: clinicians need clearer guidance
- ‘To treat or not to treat’. Kerrie Wooltorton, lessons to learn
- The harm principle, personal identity and identity-relative paternalism