Article Text
Abstract
Objectives—To investigate the factors considered by staff, and the practicalities involved in the decision making process regarding the withdrawal or withholding of potential life-sustaining treatment in a children's hospital. To compare our current practice with that recommended by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) guidelines, published in 1997.
Design—A prospective, observational study using self-reported questionnaires.
Setting—Tertiary paediatric hospital.
Patients and participants—Consecutive patients identified during a six-month period, about whom a formal discussion took place between medical staff, nursing staff and family regarding the withholding or withdrawal of potentially life-sustaining treatments. The primary physician and primary nurse involved in the discussion were identified.
Method—Two questionnaires completed independently by the primary physician and nurse.
Results—Twenty-two patients were identified (median age 1 year; range 1 day—34 years). In 20 cases treatment was withdrawn or withheld, in two cases treatment was continued. Nursing staff considered family wishes and family perceptions of patient suffering as significantly more important factors in decision making than medical staff, who considered prognostic factors as most important. In only two cases were the patient's expressed wishes apparently available. In most cases staff considered the patient's best interests were served and the process would not be enhanced by the involvement of an independent ethics committee. The exceptions were those cases in which treatment was continued following disagreement between parties.
Conclusions—Our current practice is consistent with that recommended by the RCPCH. The contribution of the patient, provision of staff counselling and general practitioner (GP) involvement were identified as areas for improvement.
- Withdrawal
- limitation
- life-sustaining
- therapy
- treatment
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Karen Street MA (Oxon), MRCP, is Specialist Registrar in Paediatrics, Southwest Deanery. Richard Ashcroft, MA, PhD, is Lecturer in Medical Ethics, Department of Primary Care and General Practice, Imperial College School of Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, London. John Henderson, MD, FRCP, FRCP (Edin), FRCPCH, is Senior Lecturer in Child Health, Institute of Child Health, University of Bristol. Alastair V Campbell, MA, BD, ThD, is Professor of Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- End-of-life decision-making for newborns: a 12-year experience in Hong Kong
- Drugs used for comfort care after withdrawal of intensive treatment in tertiary neonatal units in the UK
- The epidemiology of hypernatraemia in hospitalised children in Lothian: a 10-year study showing differences between dehydration, osmoregulatory dysfunction and salt poisoning
- How to make the RCPCH CPD guidelines work for you
- Paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with COVID-19: a new virus and a new case presentation
- Should religious beliefs be allowed to stonewall a secular approach to withdrawing and withholding treatment in children?
- Characteristics of deaths occurring in hospitalised children: changing trends
- Cardiac arrest in the paediatric intensive care unit: defining the problem and developing solutions
- Public and patient involvement in child health research and service improvements: a survey of hospital doctors