Article info
Causal authorship and the equality principle: a defence of the acts/omissions distinction in euthanasia
Citation
Causal authorship and the equality principle: a defence of the acts/omissions distinction in euthanasia
Publication history
- First published August 1, 2000.
Online issue publication
August 01, 2000
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2000 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Life support and euthanasia, a perspective on Shaw's new perspective
- Passive euthanasia
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- A defence of a new perspective on euthanasia
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- Moral duties and euthanasia: why to kill is not necessarily the same as to let die
- Attitudes towards euthanasia in Iran: the role of altruism
- The acceptability of ending a patient’s life
- Terminal sedation: source of a restless ethical debate