rss
J Med Ethics 2000;26:231-236 doi:10.1136/jme.26.4.231

Starting clinical trials of xenotransplantation—reflections on the ethics of the early phase

  1. Stellan Welin
  1. Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden
  1. Address for correspondence: Centre for Research Ethics, Göteborg University, Box 700, SE-405 30 Göteborg, Sweden. email: swelin{at}cre.gu.se

    Abstract

    What kind of patients may be recruited to early clinical trials of xenotransplantation? This is discussed under the assumption that the risk of viral infection to the public is non-negligible. Furthermore, the conditions imposed by the Helsinki declaration are analysed. The conclusion is that only patients at risk of dying and with no alternative treatment available should be recruited to xenotransplantation trials in the early phase. For some of the less dangerous cell or islet cell xenotransplantation other categories might be recruited. The risk of cell and islet cell xenotransplantation should, however, be weighted against the development of other technologies.

    In order to safeguard the public, the opt-out clause in the Helsinki declaration should not be fully applied. Legally binding rules on obligatory monitoring and restrictions should be imposed—before clinical trials start. Journal of Medical Ethics

    Footnotes

    • Stellan Welin is Associate Professor and Director of the Centre for Research Ethics at Göteborg University.

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.