Article info
Research Article
Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 3. A proposal for a don't-ask-don't-tell policy.
Citation
Bioethics of the refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses: Part 3. A proposal for a don't-ask-don't-tell policy.
Publication history
- First published December 1, 1999.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Bioethical aspects of the recent changes in the policy of refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses
- Medical confidentiality and the protection of Jehovah's Witnesses' autonomous refusal of blood
- Applying the four principles
- Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions
- The ethics of policy writing: how should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices?
- Jehovah’s Witnesses in the emergency department: what are their rights?
- Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions
- Methods and principles in biomedical ethics
- Principlism and moral dilemmas: a new principle
- Refusal of potentially life-saving blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses: should doctors explain that not all JWs think it's religiously required?