Article info
Research Article
Prenatal diagnosis and discrimination against the disabled.
Citation
Prenatal diagnosis and discrimination against the disabled.
Publication history
- First published April 1, 1999.
Online issue publication
April 01, 1999
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence
- Impact of prenatal diagnosis on survival of newborns with four congenital heart defects: a prospective, population-based cohort study in France (the EPICARD Study)
- Consumerism in prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for ethical guidelines
- The expressivist objection to prenatal diagnosis: can it be laid to rest?
- Would you terminate a pregnancy affected by sickle cell disease? Analysis of views of patients in Cameroon
- Hostile environments? Down’s syndrome and genetic screening in contemporary culture
- Is there a coherent social conception of disability?
- Investigating the use of ultrasonography for the antenatal diagnosis of structural congenital anomalies in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
- Is there an ethical difference between preimplantation genetic diagnosis and abortion?
- Disability, gene therapy and eugenics - a challenge to John Harris