Article info
PDFResearch Article
Can unequal be more fair? Ethics, subject allocation, and randomised clinical trials.
Citation
Can unequal be more fair? Ethics, subject allocation, and randomised clinical trials.
Publication history
- First published December 1, 1998.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Can unequal be more fair? A response to Andrew Avins
- Who is my brother's keeper?
- Should desperate volunteers be included in randomised controlled trials?
- Trust based obligations of the state and physician-researchers to patient-subjects
- Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries
- Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy
- Attitudes towards clinical research among cancer trial participants and non-participants: an interview study using a Grounded Theory approach
- Ethics and methods in surgical trials
- Randomised placebo-controlled trials of surgery: ethical analysis and guidelines
- The Ebola clinical trials: a precedent for research ethics in disasters