Article info
PDFResearch Article
'Wrongful life' lawsuits for faulty genetic counselling: should the impaired newborn be entitled to sue?
Citation
'Wrongful life' lawsuits for faulty genetic counselling: should the impaired newborn be entitled to sue?
Publication history
- First published December 1, 1998.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Does the rejection of wrongful life claims rely on a conceptual error?
- Could conception, birth or life be ‘wrong’?
- Disability, gene therapy and eugenics - a challenge to John Harris
- Can there be wrongful life at the end of life? German courts revisit an old problem in a new context
- In the world of Dolly, when does a human embryo acquire respect?
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- Chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis: ethical considerations of the Belgian approach
- A wrongful existence in the Netherlands
- Social determinants of health and slippery slopes in assisted dying debates: lessons from Canada
- Waiving legal rights in research