Article info
Research Article
Freedom to box.
Citation
Freedom to box.
Publication history
- First published February 1, 1998.
Online issue publication
February 01, 1998
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- The law and ethics of male circumcision: guidance for doctors
- Amateur boxing and risk of chronic traumatic brain injury: systematic review of observational studies
- Value judgment, harm, and religious liberty
- The search for meaningful comparisons in boxing and medical ethics
- The development of professional guidelines on the law and ethics of male circumcision
- Boxing, mixed martial arts, and other risky sports: is the BMA confused?
- Boxing should be banned unless rules are tightened, advises Dutch body
- BMA criticises increased funding for boxing
- Rationalising circumcision: from tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom—critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation
- The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law