rss
J Med Ethics 1991;17:89-90 doi:10.1136/jme.17.2.89
  • Research Article

The rules of insanity: commentary on: psychopathic disorder: a category mistake?

  1. C Elliott
  1. Bioethics Research Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

      Abstract

      This paper addresses Colin Holmes's suggestion that the psychopathic disorder is best regarded not as a psychiatric concept, but as an ethical one. The paper argues that the concept of psychopathy, like many other concepts, can span both psychiatry and ethics, and that it is not clear what removing if from the realm of psychiatry would entail. Also, the question of whether the concept of psychopathy is useful for psychiatrists must be separated from the question of whether psychopaths should be exonerated from the moral and legal responsibility for their actions.

      This Article

      Services

      1. Request permissions

      Responses

      1. Submit a response
      2. No responses published

      Social bookmarking

      Register for free content


      Free sample
      This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JME.
      View free sample issue >>

      Free archive
      The full back archive is now available for JME. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
      Register to access the free archive >>

      Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.