Article Text
Response
Clinical use of placebo treatments may undermine the trust of patients: a response to Gold and Lichtenberg
Abstract
There is an obvious need for a critical discussion of the concepts ‘placebo’ and ‘placebo effect’. In a recent paper on the use of placebos in clinical medicine, Gold and Lichtenberg note the conceptual difficulties but use the terminology in a confused way throughout their paper. In our response, we demonstrate these problems with a few examples from their paper.
- Clinical Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- What do we really know about the deliberate use of placebos in clinical practice?
- Deliberate use of placebos in clinical practice: what we really know
- The ethics of the placebo in clinical practice revisited
- Patients’ attitudes about the use of placebo treatments: telephone survey
- Physician perspectives on placebo ethics
- Patient attitudes about the clinical use of placebo: qualitative perspectives from a telephone survey
- Placebo effects and racial and ethnic health disparities: an unjust and underexplored connection
- Placebo effects and the molecular biological components involved
- Neurofeedback as placebo: a case of unintentional deception?
- The moral case for the clinical placebo