Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Lewis Petrinovich, Cambridge, Mass, London, England, MIT Press, 1999, ix + 431 pages, £31.50 (hc).
This book by a distinguished American psychologist is the “third in a trilogy that applies evolutionary principles to understand the nature of human morality” (page vii). This reviewer has not read the previous two volumes, and his grasp of the content of this one may suffer as a result.
The present volume contains two parts. Part One provides a background to the main discussion, with chapters on human evolution, the affinities and contrasts between human and non-human primate societies, human and non-human cognition etc. Part two discusses the moral status of animals on this basis, with special reference to the morality of animal experimentation, though agriculture, zoos etc are also discussed. The general conclusion is that, while we certainly have duties to animals we rightly privilege human interests in ways which animal right-ists and liberationists say that we should not, chief examples being Peter Singer and Tom Regan. …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Should we enhance animals?
- The production of medicoethical misconduct: medical ethics and vivisection in Wilkie Collins’s Heart and Science
- Laboratory animals and the art of empathy
- Vivisection through the eyes of Wilkie Collins, HG Wells and John Galsworthy
- The ethical justification for the use of non-human primates in research: the Weatherall report revisited
- Commentary
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- A flimsy case for the use of non-human primates in research: a reply to Arnason
- An intellectual history of suffering in the Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 1978–2014
- Unit 731 and moral repair