Article Text
Abstract
The recent case of German siblings Patrick Stübing (age 30 years) and his sister Susan Karolewski (age 22 years) has reignited debate over the criminalisation of sexual intercourse among consanguine descendants. The primary justification for criminalising incest is the purported increased risk of genetic disabilities among offspring, but is criminalising sexual intercourse an empirically sound and proportionate response to this increased risk? To answer this question we must consider the specifics of the harm in question (eg, is it a harm to the child or a societal harm) and the magnitude of the harms of the intervention. The example of incest law has important implications for liberal societies. If we can justify imprisoning consenting adults for choosing partners who will increase the risk of having children with disabilities, then we set a troubling precedent for all couples who may pass on genetic disorders to their children.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Parental procreative obligation and the categorisation of disease: the case of cystic fibrosis
- Genetic disorders in the Arab world
- Genetic discrimination in life insurance: empirical evidence from a cross sectional survey of genetic support groups in the United Kingdom
- The challenge of integrating genetic medicine into primary care
- Is there a duty to share genetic information?
- Perceptions of genetic discrimination among people at risk for Huntington’s disease: a cross sectional survey
- Primary prevention of neurological illness early in life
- Firing up the nature/nurture controversy: bioethics and genetic determinism
- The new genetics: Psychological responses to genetic testing
- The genetics of cystic fibrosis lung disease