Article Text
Abstract
COVID-19 has created additional challenges in mental health services, including the impact of social distancing measures on care and treatment. For situations where a detention under mental health legislation is required to keep an individual safe, psychiatrists may consider whether to conduct an assessment in person or using video technology. The Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 does not stipulate that an assessment has to be conducted in person. Yet, the Code of Practice envisions that detention assessments would be conducted face to face in all circumstances. During the pandemic, the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland, a statutory body with a duty to promote best practice of the Act, has been asked whether it may be acceptable and indeed preferable for some assessments to be conducted via video technology. Where an assessment is needed to determine if a patient needs to be detained, and where there is a need for social distancing or the need for ‘shielding’, remote assessments may in some circumstances be preferable. In this article, we outline the modification of the Mental Welfare Commission’s previous outright rejection of virtual assessments as the pandemic progressed and discuss the ethical and legal issues the possibility of remote assessments has exposed. We also discuss the limits and when a virtual assessment is not considered ethical. As the pandemic moves from a state of emergency into a ‘new normal’ in psychiatric services during second, or subsequent, waves, the use and place (if any) of remote assessments for detention needs to be considered.
- COVID-19
- mentally ill and disabled persons
- legal aspects
- psychiatry
Data availability statement
There are no data in this work.
This article is made freely available for use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.
https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usageStatistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
There are no data in this work.
Footnotes
Twitter @lesaangelica
Contributors The concept for this article was developed by AC. LS coordinated the development of the manuscript. AC, MC, GM, LD and MD contributed to, edited and approved the final version of the article.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Author note Author Laura Dunlop has commented on this paper in personal capacity.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Virtual risk assessment pathway for deep venous thrombosis: a preliminary model
- Development, implementation and evaluation of high-quality virtual preoperative anaesthetic assessment during COVID-19 and beyond: a quality improvement report
- Rehabilitation post-COVID-19: cross-sectional observations using the Stanford Hall remote assessment tool
- Safety implications of remote assessments for suspected COVID-19: qualitative study in UK primary care
- Mental Health Act: doctors should not use video assessments to detain patients during pandemic, say judges
- Virtual clinics in glaucoma care: face-to-face versus remote decision-making
- Mental health: patients and service in crisis
- Associations of remote mental healthcare with clinical outcomes: a natural language processing enriched electronic health record data study protocol
- Community Ageing Research 75+ (CARE75+) REMOTE study: a remote model of recruitment and assessment of the health, well-being and social circumstances of older people
- Protocol for Rhapsody: a longitudinal observational study examining the feasibility of speech phenotyping for remote assessment of neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders