Article Text
Abstract
When people use online platforms to solicit funds from others for health-related needs, they are engaging in medical crowdfunding. This form of crowdfunding is growing in popularity, and its visibility is increasing as campaigns are commonly shared via social networking. A number of ethical issues have been raised about medical crowdfunding, one of which is that it introduces a number of privacy concerns. While campaigners are encouraged to share very personal details to encourage donations, the sharing of such details may result in privacy losses for the beneficiary. Here, we explore the ways in which privacy can be threatened through the practice of medical crowdfunding by exploring campaigns (n=100) for children with defined health needs scraped from the GoFundMe platform. We found specific privacy concerns related to the disclosure of private details about the beneficiary, the inclusion of images and the nature of the relationship between campaigner, funding recipient and beneficiary. For example, it was found that identifying personal and medical details about the beneficiary, including symptoms (n=52) and treatment history (n=43), were often mentioned by campaigners. While the privacy concerns identified are problematic, they are also difficult to remedy given the strong financial incentive to crowdfund. However, crowdfunding platforms can enhance privacy protections by, for example, requiring those campaigning on behalf of child beneficiaries to ensure consent has been obtained from their guardians and providing additional guidelines for the inclusion of personal information in campaigns made on behalf of those not able to give their consent to the campaign.
- Ethics
- Confidentiality/Privacy
- Children
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors JS obtained the data for this study and contributed to the research design, data analysis, manuscript writing and manuscript editing. VAC contributed to the research design, data analysis, manuscript writing and manuscript editing.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethical implications of medical crowdfunding: the case of Charlie Gard
- Appealing to the crowd: ethical justifications in Canadian medical crowdfunding campaigns
- Spatially exploring the intersection of socioeconomic status and Canadian cancer-related medical crowdfunding campaigns
- Medical crowdfunding in China: empirics and ethics
- Privacy, confidentiality and abortion statistics: a question of public interest?
- ‘I haven’t met them, I don’t have any trust in them. It just feels like a big unknown’: a qualitative study exploring the determinants of consent to use Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority registry data in research
- Impact of privacy legislation on the number and characteristics of people who are recruited for research: a randomised controlled trial
- Crowdfunding for health research: a qualitative evidence synthesis and a pilot programme
- GMC confidentiality guidance 2017
- Protecting health privacy even when privacy is lost