Article Text
PDF
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Introduction
Rosamond Rhodes makes a persuasive case for the view that medical ethics does not derive from common morality.1 Rhodes identifies the challenge that immediately arises and its corollary: Whence the origin of medical ethics? And, should we understand medical ethics as autonomous? From the perspective of professional ethics in medicine, the first question can now be restated: Whence the origin of the ethical concept of medicine as a profession, the basis of the ethical obligations of physicians in patient care, research, medical education, and in advocacy and healthcare policy?
The Ethical Concept of Medicine as a Profession as a Discovery
The history of Western philosophy offers us two pathways to address this question. The first is the quest for certainty,2 a quest fulfilled by using methods designed to discover concepts that are independent of human thought and judgement and thus intellectually and morally authoritative for everyone. Such concepts are timeless and therefore transcultural, transreligious and transnational. Examples include Plato’s Forms,3 PF Stawson’s (1919–2006) ‘our conceptual structure’,4 Edmund Pellegrino’s (1920–2003) ‘fact of illness’ and the ‘act of profession’ in response to the vulnerability that illness creates,5 and common morality.6 Thought experiments, using what Rhodes characterises as ‘the hypethetico-deductive method’,1 aim to discover timeless concepts.
Discovering timeless concepts must address their ontological and epistemological status. Plato’s ontology of Forms,2 for example, is not clear, as …
Footnotes
Contributors I am sole author of this paper, which is original work, not previously published, and not submitted elsewhere.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Commentary
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Taking a moral holiday? Physicians’ practical identities at the margins of professional ethics
- Why not common morality?
- On Rhodes’s failure to appreciate the connections between common morality theory and professional biomedical ethics
- Practical virtue ethics: healthcare whistleblowing and portable digital technology
- Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration
- A waste of time: the problem of common morality in Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- Why only common morality?
- Towards a European code of medical ethics. Ethical and legal issues
- A Defence of medical ethics as uncommon morality
- Uncommon misconceptions and common morality