Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Going high and low: on pluralism and neutrality in human embryology policy-making
  1. Hafez Ismaili M'hamdi1,
  2. Nicolas C Rivron2,
  3. Eva CA Asscher3
  1. 1Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Wien, Austria
  3. 3Medical ethics/General Practice, Amsterdam UMC - Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr Hafez Ismaili M'hamdi, Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands; h.ismailimhamdi{at}erasmusmc.nl

Abstract

Formulating sound and acceptable embryo research policy remains challenging especially in a pluralistic world. This challenge has acquired a new dimension of complexity with the advent of so-called embryo models, which are derived from stem cells. In this article, we present a normative strategy to facilitate the process of sound policy-making in the field of human embryology. This strategy involves seeking neutral agreements on higher level theories and doctrines as well as seeking agreements on the level of concrete policy proposals. We call this strategy: going high and low. By going high and low, the plurality of reasonable moral and epistemic convictions of stakeholders involved in the domain of human embryology is respected while the process of policy-making in this area is improved.

  • Policy
  • Embryo Research
  • Embryos and Fetuses
  • Philosophy

Data availability statement

Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study. No data are available.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study. No data are available.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors HIM authored the paper. NCR and ECAA advised HIM and provided input to improve the quality of the paper.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Other content recommended for you