Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Join the Lone Kidney Club: incentivising live organ donation
  1. Annet Glas1,2
  1. 1 Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany
  2. 2 Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Faculty of Biology, Martinsried, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Annet Glas, Max-Planck-Institute of Neurobiology, Planegg-Martinsried 82152, Germany; annetglas{at}neuro.mpg.de

Abstract

Given the dramatic shortage of transplantable organs, demand cannot be met by established and envisioned organ procurement policies targeting postmortem donation. Live organ donation (LOD) is a medically attractive option, and ethically permissible if informed consent is given and donor beneficence balances recipient non-maleficence. Only a few legal and regulatory frameworks incentivise LOD, with the key exception of Israel’s Organ Transplant Law, which has produced significant improvements in organ donation rates. Therefore, I propose an organ procurement system that incentivises LOD by allocating additional priority points to the living donor on any transplant waiting list. I outline benefits and challenges for potential recipients, donors and society at large, and suggest measures to ensure medical protection of marginalised patient groups.

  • allocation of organs/tissues
  • transplantation

Data availability statement

There are no data in this work.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

There are no data in this work.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.