Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Non-medical egg freezing (NMEF) is egg freezing for the sake of delaying parenthood. The label ‘non-medical’ can be confusing, since the extraction and freezing of eggs is undeniably a medical procedure. The point is that whereas ‘medical egg freezing’ is done in order to retain capacity to procreate despite a potentially threatening medical condition (eg, cancer), ‘non-medical egg freezing’ is done for the sake of getting more time to find a suitable partner and/or to establish a career before embarking on parenthood.
One type of argument against NMEF is the individualisation argument, according to which NMEF is problematic in virtue of being an individual solution to a social problem. The underlying problem that ought to be targeted, it is argued, is the patriarchal structures in the labour market, which disprivilege women and make it excessively difficult to combine a work and parenthood.
In “Arguments on thin ice”, Thomas Søbirk Petersen helpfully distinguishes between three variants of the individualisation argument: the non-address view, the distraction view and the further oppression view.1 Petersen argues, moreover, that none of these is convincing, and therefore that the rejection of NMEF is unwarranted.
According to the non-address view, the reason NMEF ought to be rejected is that “it cannot address the social causes that make it so difficult to balance career and family”2 or that it “does not substantially alter the social structures that have constructed inequalities”3 between women and men. Petersen argues, convincingly in …
Footnotes
Correction notice Since this article was first published online, the University of Oslo has been added to the affiliation list.
Contributors OMM is the sole author.
Funding This study was funded by The Research Council of Norway. Grant: 259521.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Arguments on thin ice: on non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments
- Advancing technologies as both our saviour and our doom
- Egg freezing for non-medical uses: the lack of a relational approach to autonomy in the new Israeli policy and in academic discussion
- Discussing social hierarchies and the importance of genetic ties: a commentary on Petersen
- Non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments: reply to Moen, Segers and Campo-Engelstein
- Disentangling the individualisation argument against non-medical egg freezing from feminist critiques
- Beyond individualisation: towards a more contextualised understanding of women’s social egg freezing experiences
- Effectiveness of social egg freezing: protocol for systematic review and meta-analyses
- Reproductive technologies are not the cure for social problems
- Single women’s access to egg freezing in mainland China: an ethicolegal analysis