Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
I am happy to comment on T S Petersen’s1 examination of the ‘individualization argument against non-medical egg freezing (NMEF)’. Petersen intervenes in the ethical discussion on egg freezing by critically reconsidering a specific type of argument against oocyte cryopreservation for reasons that are not directly related with medical issues. Petersen dissects the claim that such non-medical usage is ‘an individualistic and morally problematic solution to the social problems that women face, for instance, in the labour market’.1 Proponents of this argument believe that egg freezing should not be used by women on an individual level to solve social problems but that one should instead address gendered inequalities on the labour market. Petersen asserts that this individualisation argument is unconvincing—although morally appealing—because of empirically and ethically flawed assumptions. I am enthusiastic—with some minor reservations—about his unravelment of the individualisation argument and his call for more empirical backing.
As I understand his presentation, the argument that is the subject of Petersen’s analysis is a recurring argumentative trope in the broader realm of assisted reproduction ethics. For instance, the anticipated positive effect of artificial womb technology in terms of liberation from reproductive and related social inequalities is one of the most dominant ectogenesis …
Footnotes
Contributors I am the sole author.
Funding The author has not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Arguments on thin ice: on non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments
- Advancing technologies as both our saviour and our doom
- Individual solutions to social problems
- Non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments: reply to Moen, Segers and Campo-Engelstein
- Disentangling the individualisation argument against non-medical egg freezing from feminist critiques
- Egg freezing for non-medical uses: the lack of a relational approach to autonomy in the new Israeli policy and in academic discussion
- Beyond individualisation: towards a more contextualised understanding of women’s social egg freezing experiences
- More than an idea: why ectogestation should become a concrete option
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood
- Effectiveness of social egg freezing: protocol for systematic review and meta-analyses