Article Text
Abstract
Moodley and Rennie’s paper arguing against penile transplantation stated out of context arguments and wrongly quoted statements. The cost of penile transplantation is much less than portrayed. The burden of cases is much less than is communicated. The men on our penis transplantation programme represent the poorest of the poor and are one of the most discriminated against groups of humans on earth. The false hope said to be created by Moodley is indeed not false hope at all as there is a real possibility that most patients on our waiting list may be transplanted. Moodley argues that government has, in the context of penile transplantation, no duty to cure those who lost a penis after ritual circumcision, but only an obligation to prevent this from happening. A ‘yuk’ reaction, similarly described in facial transplantation, may be present in colleagues arguing against penile transplantation.
- circumcision
- ethics
- surgery
- transplantation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors AvdM is the sole contributor.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Penile transplantation as an appropriate response to botched traditional circumcisions in South Africa: an argument against
- Delineating the role of penile transplantation when traditional male circumcisions go wrong in South Africa
- Facial allograft transplantation, personal identity and subjectivity
- Until they have faces: the ethics of facial allograft transplantation
- Vascularised composite allotransplantation: implications for the Defence Medical Services
- Justifying surgery’s last taboo: the ethics of face transplants
- Equity in access to facial transplantation
- ‘A Procedure Without a Problem’, or the face transplant that didn’t happen. The Royal Free, the Royal College of Surgeons and the challenge of surgical firsts
- Face transplantation for the blind: more than being blind in a sighted world
- Uterus transplantation: ethical and regulatory challenges