Article Text
Abstract
In 1989, Susan Wolf convincingly warned of a troublesome consequence that should discourage any movement in American society towards physician-assisted death—a legal backlash against the gains made for limiting life-sustaining treatment. The authors demonstrate that this dire consequence did not come to pass. As physician-assisted suicide gains a foothold in USA and elsewhere, many other slippery slope arguments are being put forward. Although many of these speculations should be taken seriously, they do not justify halting the new practice. Instead, our courts, regulatory agencies, journalists, professional organisations and researchers should carefully monitor and study it as it unfolds, allowing continuous improvement just as our society has done in implementing the practice of limiting life-sustaining treatment.
- prolongation of life and euthanasia
- care of the dying patient
- end of life care
- suicide/assisted suicide
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors Both authors were responsible for the conceptual aspects of the paper, the research and the writing.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven
- Of dilemmas and tensions: a qualitative study of palliative care physicians’ positions regarding voluntary active euthanasia in Quebec, Canada
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- Treatment-resistant depression and physician-assisted death
- Competence for physician-assisted death of patients with mental disorders: theoretical and practical considerations
- The case for physician assisted suicide: how can it possibly be proven?
- Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. An Argument Against Legislation
- Death - whose decision? Euthanasia and the terminally ill
- Euthanasia, efficiency, and the historical distinction between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die