Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2001;27:5-11; doi:10.1136/jme.27.1.5
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.
J Med Ethics 2001; 27:5-11
© 2001 the Journal of Medical Ethics

Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability

Mark Sklansky

University of California, San Diego, California, USA

Abstract

Despite tremendous advances in medical care for critically ill newborn infants, caregivers in neonatal intensive care units still struggle with how to approach those patients whose prognoses appear to be the most grim, and whose treatments appear to be the most futile. Although the practice of passive neonatal euthanasia, from a moral perspective, has been widely (albeit quietly) condoned, those clinicians and families involved in such cases may still be found legally guilty of child abuse or even manslaughter. Passive neonatal euthanasia remains both a moral dilemma and a legal ambiguity. Even the definition of passive euthanasia remains unclear. This manuscript reviews the basic moral and legal considerations raised by the current practice of neonatal euthanasia, and examines the formal position statements of the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics. The paper concludes by emphasising the need, at least in the United States, to clarify the legal status of this relatively common medical practice.

Key Words: Euthanasia • neonatal intensive care • defective newborns


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Barr, P. (2007). Relationship of neonatologists' end-of-life decisions to their personal fear of death. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 92: F104-F107 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mears, B. J. (2006). Treatment Decisions for Disabled Infants: Balancing Benefits & Burdens. AAP Grand Rounds 16: 66-67 [Full Text]  
  • Herissone-Kelly, P (2006). Procreative beneficence and the prospective parent.. J. Med. Ethics 32: 166-169 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Vince, T, Petros, A (2006). Should children's autonomy be respected by telling them of their imminent death?. J. Med. Ethics 32: 21-23 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gladsjo, J. A., Breding, J., Sine, D., Wells, R., Kalemkiarian, S., Oak, J., Vieira, A. S., Fallo Friedlander, S. (2004). Termination of Life Support After Severe Child Abuse: The Role of a Guardian ad Litem. Pediatrics 113: e141-145 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cuttini, M, Casotto, V, Kaminski, M, de Beaufort, I, Berbik, I, Hansen, G, Kollee, L, Kucinskas, A, Lenoir, S, Levin, A, Orzalesi, M, Persson, J, Rebagliato, M, Reid, M, Saracci, R (2004). Should euthanasia be legal? An international survey of neonatal intensive care units staff. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 89: F19-F24 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.