Article Text
Abstract
Background To prevent the planet from catastrophic global warming a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions to net zero is required. Thus, divestment from fossil fuels must be a strategic interest for health insurers. The aim of this study was to analyse the implementation of environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria in German private health insurers’ investments.
Methods In 2019 a survey about ESG strategies was sent to German private health insurance companies. The survey evaluated investment strategies and thresholds for the exclusion of sectors and business practices, as well as company strategies for sustainable business development.
Findings Given their business reports, German private health insurers manage assets of more than €350 billion. 11 of 40 insurance companies provided quantitative data, 10 refused to answer. According to quantitative data, €66 billion of assets is managed according to any ESG criteria; this equals an average of 76% of each company’s bonds. None of these insurers excluded the production and sale of fossil fuels. All excluded coal mining but only at high thresholds. For €226 billion, no data were provided.
Interpretation The findings are in contrast to the expected intrinsic economic interest of the insurers to stop global warming and improve public health. The majority of assets are managed in a highly problematic manner, especially the absence of capital allocated in fields contrary to medical ethics (eg, firearms, armour) cannot be presumed. Lack of transparency is a major problem that limits clients in choosing the insurer who has the most advanced ESG criteria.
- applied and professional ethics
- environmental ethics
- health care economics
- interests of health personnel/institutions
- public health ethics
Data availability statement
Not all participating insurance companies provided consent to publish the provided data along with their name, thus anonymised data are available from the corresponding author for reasonable request.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- How Wellcome’s opaque fossil fuel investments harm its global health mission
- Investing in humanity: The BMJ’s divestment campaign
- Fossil fuel companies and climate change: the case for divestment
- Climate change: the implications for policy on injury control and health promotion
- Medical organisations must divest from fossil fuels
- Improving the environmental sustainability of paediatric care
- The health sector and fiscal policies of fossil fuels: an essential alignment for the health and climate change agenda
- Climate change
- Air pollution deaths attributable to fossil fuels: observational and modelling study
- Healthy response to climate change