Article Text
Abstract
The current system of ethical review for medical research in the United Kingdom is changing from the current system involving large committees of 7–18 members reviewing every individual application to a system involving pre-review by small sub-committees of National Research Ethics Officers (NREAs), who have a remit to approve studies if they believe there are no material ethical issues imposed by the research. The reliability of this new system depends on the reliability of the NREAs and in particular the ability of small groups to effectively identify and appropriately assess the seriousness of all the material ethical issues that may be posed by an application. There is anecdotal evidence to suggest that many individual research ethics committee members have had experience of believing that a study presents no material ethical concerns, then on reaching the committee and discussing the application they realise that the committee feels it does present significant ethical concerns. If this is the case then this casts doubt on the reliability of NREAs or small groups to effectively identify ethically problematic research and appropriately respond to this to protect research participants. In this paper we describe a small questionnaire based piece of research carried out to assess how common this and other relevant experiences are.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues
- Efficiency and the proposed reforms to the NHS research ethics system
- The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC
- Determining the need for ethical review: a three-stage Delphi study
- Non-commercial clinical trials of a medicinal product: can they survive the current process of research approvals in the UK?
- Beyond regulatory approaches to ethics: making space for ethical preparedness in healthcare research
- Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial
- New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants’ interest
- Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project
- Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity