Decisions at the end of life: an empirical study on the involvement, legal understanding and ethical views of preregistration house officers
J Schildmann, L Doyal, A Cushing, and J Vollmann
J Med Ethics 2006
32: 567-570.
On page 569, 2nd paragraph, line 19:
"Equally in table 2, 64.4% of the respondents considered the withdrawal of intravenous hydration to be morally 'inappropriate', even
presumably for permanent vegetative state."
In this sentence the figure (64.4%) refers to the proportion of respondents who considered the withdrawal of intravenous hydration to be morally 'appropriate'.
