Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Our hospital routine requires that all new admissions must be asked about their code status. It is not uncommon for an otherwise healthy patient to request that a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order be placed in their chart. Presumably, these patients who wish to have a DNR order are acting on the belief that should an unforeseen, irreversible condition occur that leads to a cardiac arrest, they would not want to undergo resuscitation. Tragically, we have witnessed several instances in which potentially life-saving interventions were withheld in viable patients in non-arrest settings for reversible conditions (eg, intubation for nosocomial pneumonia) because the patients had a DNR order in the chart. Unfortunately, this happens when the treating physicians are not aware of the limited scope of a DNR order and instead use the order as a blanket prohibition against all components of resuscitation. This communication failure is due to misconceptions that patients and their physicians have with regard to such orders. The medical community is well overdue to improve the end-of-life decisions offered to patients beyond relying on the outdated term DNR.
LIMITATIONS OF DNR ORDERS
Despite the major advances in critical care medicine in the past few decades, doctors have not substantially improved their ability to address end-of-life decisions any better than by using the all-encompassing term DNR. Currently, the term is generally accepted as an order to prohibit the use of interventions to reverse a cardiac or pulmonary arrest.1 2 What is frequently forgotten with the DNR order is that …
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Evaluation of end of life care in cancer patients at a teaching hospital in Japan
- Honouring patient's resuscitation wishes: a multiphased effort to improve identification and documentation
- Should patient consent be required to write a do not resuscitate order?
- Scale of levels of care versus DNR orders
- “Do-not-resuscitate” orders in patients with cancer at a children’s hospital in Taiwan
- Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?
- The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act
- Variation in the design of Do Not Resuscitate orders and other code status options: a multi-institutional qualitative study
- Are do-not-resuscitate orders associated with limitations of care beyond their intended purpose in patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage? Analysis of the ABC-ICH study
- Effect of do-not-resuscitate orders on patients with sepsis in the medical intensive care unit: a retrospective, observational and propensity score-matched study in a tertiary referral hospital in Taiwan