JME

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Medical Ethics 2005;31:743-744; doi:10.1136/jme.2005.014571
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by English, V.
Right arrow Articles by Sommerville, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by English, V.
Right arrow Articles by Sommerville, A.

ETHICS BRIEFINGS

Veronica English, Rebecca Mussell, Julian Sheather, Ann Sommerville

BMA Ethics Department; ethics@bma.org.uk

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.


Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990
Historically the UK has taken its time to ponder the controversial issue of regulating assisted reproduction, with a delay of some six years between the original call for legislation in the Warnock Report1 and the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act becoming law. In between there was much consultation and debate – following the Warnock Report came a green paper (consultation document) in 19862 and a white paper (proposals for legislation) in 19873 before the bill was finally published in 1989. The review of the legislation is similarly being undertaken at a leisurely pace with plenty of time and opportunity for consultation. In 2003, we saw the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee’s Inquiry into reproductive technologies and the law, which reported in March 2005.4 This was followed in July 2005 by a full public consultation document from the Department of Health.5 The consultation ended in late November. References in . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
D Hunter and S Oultram
The challenge of "sperm ships": the need for the global regulation of medical technology
J. Med. Ethics, July 1, 2008; 34(7): 552 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
V. English, R. Mussell, J. Sheather, and A. Sommerville
Ethics briefings
J. Med. Ethics, February 1, 2006; 32(2): 123 - 124.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.