COMMENTARY
Christianity and the human embryo
Response to: The human embryo in the Christian tradition
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Robin Gill
University of Theology, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK; r.gill@ukc.ac.uk
Accepted 3 May 2005
Perhaps the gradualist position on abortion has re-emerged repeatedly because it corresponds to pastoral experience
Keywords: human embryo; embryo research; Christian tradition
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
At one level David Albert Joness paper is very successful. Despite the high reputation of the late Gordon Dunstan, first as a mediaeval historian, then as an ethicist of considerable influence within the Anglican church, and finally as a pioneer medical ethicist, his crucial 1984 article appears to be overdrawn. Some caution is now needed before endorsing his claim that the Christian tradition according the embryo the full moral status of a human person from conception is "virtually a creation of the later nineteenth century". Dr Jones produces a wealth of historical scholarship to challenge it.
At another level, however, Dr Jones is not concerned about nuancing a historical claim but about demonstrating that "licensing destructive research on human embryos for the sake of medical progress...cannot be justified...on the basis of the Christian tradition".1 Unfortunately there is quite a large gap between these two claims.
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
