© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
ECHO
Researchers have a new option for testing patients role in clinical decisions
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The first accurate measure of patient participation in clinical decisions will ultimately help to determine whether this involvement improves patient outcome, say its creators. An evaluation study of its performance has already shown that general practitioners (GPs) actually share decisions with their patients much less than their positive attitude would suggest.
Mean score with the OPTION scale for patient involvement in decisions in consultations with 21 GPs on a scale of 0100 was low (16.9 (SD 7.7) 95% confidence interval 15.8 to 18.0; minimum score 3.3, maximum 44.2). Distribution of scores was skewed towards low values.
The scale performed well in tests of validity and reliability. Within constructs measures of rater agreement within each item, agreement among raters, and homogeneity of the scale all indicated the scores reliability. Construct validity was also demonstrated.
The scale was devised to satisfy accepted competencies for making shared decisions. It was piloted among GPs
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
