Article Text
PDF
Abstract
The practice of transplantation of vital organs from “brain-dead” donors is in a state of theoretical disarray. Although the law and prevailing medical ethics treat patients diagnosed as having irreversible total brain failure as dead, scholars have increasingly challenged the established rationale for regarding these patients as dead. To understand the ethical situation that we now face, it is helpful to revisit the writings of the philosopher Hans Jonas, who forcefully challenged the emerging effort to redefine death in the late 1960s.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
The opinions expressed are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the policy of the National Institutes of Health, the Public Health Service, or the US Department of Health and Human Services.
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Other content recommended for you
- A narrative review of the empirical evidence on public attitudes on brain death and vital organ transplantation: the need for better data to inform policy
- Abandoning the dead donor rule? A national survey of public views on death and organ donation
- Does it matter that organ donors are not dead? Ethical and policy implications
- The dead donor rule: effect on the virtuous practice of medicine
- Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death
- Organismal death, the dead-donor rule and the ethics of vital organ procurement
- On the ethical permissibility of in situ reperfusion in cardiac transplantation after the declaration of circulatory death
- Do the ‘brain dead’ merely appear to be alive?
- Decapitation and the definition of death
- Death and legal fictions