Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2008;34:344-347; doi:10.1136/jme.2007.020388
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.

Clinical ethics

An assessment of the process of informed consent at the University Hospital of the West Indies

1 Division of Anaesthesia, Department of Surgery, Radiology, Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston, Jamaica
2 Department of Surgery, Radiology, Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston, Jamaica
3 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston , Jamaica
4 Research Centre, Dean’s Office, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston, Jamaica

Correspondence to:
A T Barnett, Division of Anaesthesia, Department of Surgery, Radiology, Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica; alanbarnett777{at}gmail.com

Objective: To assess the adequacy of the process of informed consent for surgical patients at the University Hospital of the West Indies.

Method: The study is a prospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study. 210 patients at the University Hospital of the West Indies were interviewed using a standardised investigator-administered questionnaire, developed by the authors, after obtaining witnessed, informed consent for participation in the study. Data were analysed using SPSS V.12 for Windows.

Results: Of the patients, 39.4% were male. Of the surgical procedures, 68.6% were scheduled, 7.6% urgent and 23.8% emergency, 35.2% were minor and 64.8% major. Information imparted/received was acceptable in 40% of cases, good in 24% and inadequate (unacceptable) in 36% of cases. Almost all (97.6%) patients stated that they understood why an operation was planned and 93.3% thought that they had given informed consent. Most (95.2%) thought that they had free choice and made up their own mind. A quarter (25.2%) of all patients were told that it was mandatory for them to sign the form. There was a discussion of possible side effects and complications in 56.7% of patients.

Conclusions: This study clearly indicates that surgical patients at the University Hospital of the West Indies feel that they have given informed consent. However, it also suggests that more information should be given to patients for consent to be truly informed.

Keywords: informed consent; implied consent; generic consent; specific consent; autonomy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.