Article Text
Law, ethics and medicine
Exploitation and enrichment: the paradox of medical experimentation
Abstract
Modern medicine is built on a long history of medical experimentation. Experiments in the past often exploited more vulnerable patients. Questionable ethics litter the history of medicine. Without such experiments, however, millions of lives would be forfeited. This paper asks whether all the “unethical” experiments of the past were unjustifiable, and do we still exploit the poorer members of the community today? It concludes by wondering if Harris is right in his advocacy of a moral duty to participate in medical research.
- medical ethics
- experimentation
- exploitation
- history of medical research
- regulation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Other content recommended for you
- What makes clinical labour different? The case of human guinea pigging
- Reification and assent in research involving those who lack capacity
- Participation in biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: a response to John Harris
- An investigation of patients’ motivations for their participation in genetics-related research
- Systematic review and metasummary of attitudes toward research in emergency medical conditions
- Genetic research and the collective good: participants as leaders to reconcile individual and public interests
- Split views among parents regarding children’s right to decide about participation in research: a questionnaire survey
- Right of the living dead? Consent to experimental surgery in the event of cortical death
- Analysis of the status of informed consent in medical research involving human subjects in public hospitals in Shanghai
- A critical examination of research narratives ‘rumours’ and passive community resistance in medical research