You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Clinical ethics
“Allow natural death” versus “do not resuscitate”: three words that can change a life
  1. S S Venneman1,
  2. P Narnor-Harris2,
  3. M Perish3,
  4. M Hamilton4
  1. 1
    University of Houston-Victoria, Departments of Psychology & Biology, Victoria, Texas, USA
  2. 2
    DeTar Hospital, Victoria, Texas, USA
  3. 3
    University of Houston-Victoria, Victoria, Texas, USA
  4. 4
    Victoria College, Victoria, Texas, USA
  1. Dr S Venneman, Departments of Psychology & Biology, University of Houston-Victoria, 3007 N. Ben Wilson, Victoria, Texas 77901, USA; vennemans{at}uhv.edu

Abstract

Physician-written “do not resuscitate” DNR orders elicit negative reactions from stakeholders that may decrease appropriate end-of-life care. The semantic significance of the phrase has led to a proposed replacement of DNR with “allow natural death” (AND). Prior to this investigation, no scientific papers address the impact of such a change. Our results support this proposition due to increased likelihood of endorsement with the term AND.

https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.018317

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests: None declared.

    Other content recommended for you