HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carlson, R. V Articles by Webb, D. J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Carlson, R. V Articles by Webb, D. J

The three official language versions of the Declaration of Helsinki: what’s lost in translation?

¹ Medical Teaching Organisation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
² Homerton University Hospital, London, UK
³ Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
⁴ Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, Queen’s Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr R Carlson
Archie Duncan Fellow in Medical Ethics, Medical Teaching Organisation, University of Edinburgh, Chancellor’s Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK; rcarlson{at}ed.ac.uk Background: The Declaration of Helsinki, the World Medical Association’s (WMA’s) statement of ethical guidelines regarding medical research, is published in the three official languages of the WMA: English, French and Spanish.

Methods: A detailed comparison of the three official language versions was carried out to determine ways in which they differed and ways in which the wording of the three versions might illuminate the interpretation of the document.

Results: There were many minor linguistic differences between the three versions. However, in paragraphs 1, 6, 29, 30 and in the note of clarification to paragraph 29, there were differences that could be considered potentially significant in their ethical relevance.

Interpretation: Given the global status of the Declaration of Helsinki and the fact that it is translated from its official versions into many other languages for application to the ethical conduct of research, the differences identified are of concern. It would be best if such differences could be eliminated but, at the very least, a commentary to explain any differences that are unavoidable on the basis of language or culture should accompany the Declaration of Helsinki. This evidence further strengthens the case for international surveillance of medical research ethics as has been proposed by the WMA.