Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2007;33:534-537; doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018341
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.

GLOBAL MEDICAL ETHICS

Autonomy or protection from harm? Judgements of German courts on care for the elderly in nursing homes

Kai Sammet

University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of History and Ethics of Medicine, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr. med. Kai Sammet
University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of History and Ethics of Medicine, Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany; sammet{at}uke.uni-hamburg.de

ABSTRACT

The increase in life expectancy in developed countries has lead to an increase in the number of elderly people cared for in nursing homes. Given the physical frailty and deterioration of mental capacities in many of these residents, questions arise as to their autonomy and to their protection from harm. In 2005, one of the highest German courts, the Bundesgerichtshof (BGH) issued a seminal judgement that dealt with the obligations of nursing homes and with the preserving of autonomy and privacy in nursing home residents. An elderly woman had sustained a fracture of the neck of the femur during a fall. The health insurance company held that the nursing home had breached its obligations to protect her from falling and sued the home for the hospital costs of her treatment. However, the BGH maintained that the case of the health insurance was not justified. It held that obligations of nursing homes have to be limited to normal arrangements within reasonable financial and personal effort, and that the autonomy of residents had to be protected from unnecessary interference. Permanent control or even restraining measures to reduce each risk would deprive the patient fully of her autonomy, and must therefore be hindered. Other judgments of other courts have emphasised the "protectionist" approach. The article deals with these different approaches and comments on both rationales. It will be shown that both approaches must be differentiated to establish fully autonomy and protection for nursing home residents.

Abbreviations: BGH, Bundesgerichtshof

Keywords: autonomy; dementia; care for elders; nursing homes; German jurisprudence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.