Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Journal of Medical Ethics 2007;33:400-403; doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018713
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.

LAW, ETHICS AND MEDICINE

Attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide among physicians in Vermont

Alexa Craig, Beth Cronin, William Eward, James Metz, Logan Murray, Gail Rose, Eric Suess and Maria E Vergara

University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
M E Vergara
University of Vermont College of Medicine, 89 Beaumont Ave, Given Building, Burlington, VT 05405, USA; maria.vergara{at}uvm.edu

ABSTRACT

Background: Legislation on physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is being considered in a number of states since the passage of the Oregon Death With Dignity Act in 1994. Opinion assessment surveys have historically assessed particular subsets of physicians.

Objective: To determine variables predictive of physicians’ opinions on PAS in a rural state, Vermont, USA.

Design: Cross-sectional mailing survey.

Participants: 1052 (48% response rate) physicians licensed by the state of Vermont.

Results: Of the respondents, 38.2% believed PAS should be legalised, 16.0% believed it should be prohibited and 26.0% believed it should not be legislated. 15.7% were undecided. Males were more likely than females to favour legalisation (42% vs 34%). Physicians who did not care for patients through the end of life were significantly more likely to favour legalisation of PAS than physicians who do care for patients with terminal illness (48% vs 33%). 30% of the respondents had experienced a request for assistance with suicide.

Conclusions: Vermont physicians’ opinions on the legalisation of PAS is sharply polarised. Patient autonomy was a factor strongly associated with opinions in favour of legalisation, whereas the sanctity of the doctor–patient relationship was strongly associated with opinions in favour of not legislating PAS. Those in favour of making PAS illegal overwhelmingly cited moral and ethical beliefs as factors in their opinion. Although opinions on legalisation appear to be based on firmly held beliefs, approximately half of Vermont physicians who responded to the survey agree that there is a need for more education in palliative care and pain management.

Abbreviations: PAS, physician-assisted suicide


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lindblad, A., Lofmark, R., Lynoe, N. (2008). Physician-assisted suicide: a survey of attitudes among Swedish physicians. Scand J Public Health 36: 720-727 [Abstract]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.