JME

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Medical Ethics 2007;33:349-352; doi:10.1136/jme.2007.020586
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Corbellini, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Corbellini, G.

ETHICS

Scientists, bioethics and democracy: the Italian case and its meanings

Gilberto Corbellini

Correspondence to:
Professor G Corbellini
Sezione di storia della Medicina, Università "la Sapienza"Roma, Viale dell’Università 34/a, 00185 Rome, Italy;gilberto.corbellini{at}uniroma1.it
ABSTRACT
In June 2005, Italy held a referendum on repealing the law on medically assisted fertilization (Law 40/2004), which limits access to artificial reproduction to infertile couples, and prohibits the donation of gametes, the cryopreservation of embryos, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PDG), and research on human embryos. The referendum was invalidated, and the law remained unchanged. The Italian political e bioethical debate on assisted reproduction was manipulated by the Catholic Church, which distorted scientific data and issues at stake with the help of Catholic politicians and bioethicists. What happened in Italy shows that some perverse socio-cultural e political mechanisms are spreading the absurd and anti-historical view that scientific and technological advancements are threatening democracy and personal freedom. Scientists should not only contrast the political attempts at limiting freedom of scientific research, but also tell politicians, humanists and citizens that the invention of Western science with its view of scientific community as an "open society", contributed and still contributes, through scientific education, to the construction and maintaining of the moral and political values underlying Western democracies.


Abbreviations: GMO, genetically modified organism




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
E Turillazzi and V Fineschi
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a step by step guide to recent Italian ethical and legislative troubles
J. Med. Ethics, October 1, 2008; 34(10): e21 - e21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Scientists, bioethics and democracy: the Italian case and its meanings. A question to G. Corbellini
Carlo Petrini
JME Online, 30 May 2007 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.