HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sen, P. Articles by Irons, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sen, P. Articles by Irons, A.

Ethical dilemmas in forensic psychiatry: two illustrative cases

¹ Priory Secure Services, Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Chadwich Lodge, Milton Keynes, UK
² Oxfordshire Mental Healthcare NHS Trust in Forensic Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
³ Broadmoor Hospital, Crowthorne, Berkshire, Harvey Gordon, Oxford Clinic, Oxford, UK
⁴ Capsticks Solicitors, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr P Sen
Priory Secure Services, Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Chadwick Lodge, Chadwick Drive, Eaglestone, Milton Keynes, MK6 5LS, UK; piyalsen{at}blenheimhealth.com One approach to the analysis of ethical dilemmas in medical practice uses the "four principles plus scope" approach. These principles are: respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice, along with concern for their scope of application. However, conflicts between the different principles are commonplace in psychiatric practice, especially in forensic psychiatry, where duties to patients often conflict with duties to third parties such as the public. This article seeks to highlight some of the specific ethical dilemmas encountered in forensic psychiatry: the excessive use of segregation for the protection of others, the ethics of using mechanical restraint when clinically beneficial and the use of physical treatment without consent. We argue that justice, as a principle, should be paramount in forensic psychiatry, and that there is a need for a more specific code of ethics to cover specialised areas of medicine like forensic psychiatry. This code should specify that in cases of conflict between different principles, justice should gain precedence over the other principles.