JME

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Medical Ethics 2007;33:313-319; doi:10.1136/jme.2005.015529
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinto, S. L
Right arrow Articles by Algina, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinto, S. L
Right arrow Articles by Algina, J.

CLINICAL ETHICS

Physicians’ intent to comply with the American Medical Association’s guidelines on gifts from the pharmaceutical industry

Sharrel L Pinto1, Earlene Lipowski2, Richard Segal2, Carole Kimberlin2, James Algina3

1 Pharmacy Health Care Administration, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA
2 Pharmacy Health Care Administration, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
3 College of Education, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA

Correspondence to:
S L Pinto
University of Toledo College of Pharmacy, Mail Stop #609, 2801 W Bancroft Street, Toledo, OH 43606, USA; sharrel.pinto{at}utoledo.edu Objective: To identify factors that predict physicians’ intent to comply with the American Medical Association’s (AMA’s) ethical guidelines on gifts from the pharmaceutical industry.

Methods: A survey was designed and mailed in June 2004 to a random sample of 850 physicians in Florida, USA, excluding physicians with inactive licences, incomplete addresses, addresses in other states and pretest participants. Factor analysis extracted six factors: attitude towards following the guidelines, subjective norms (eg, peers, patients, etc), facilitating conditions (eg, knowledge of the guidelines, etc), profession-specific precedents (eg, institution’s policies, etc), individual-specific precedents (physicians’ own discretion, policies, etc) and intent. Multivariate regression modelling was conducted.

Results: Surveys were received from 213 physicians representing all specialties, with a net response rate of 25.5%. 62% (n = 133) of respondents were aware of the guidelines; 50% (n = 107) had read them. 48% (n = 102) thought that following the guidelines would increase physicians’ credibility and professional image; 68% (n = 145) agreed that it was important to do so. Intent to comply was positively associated with attitude, subjective norms, facilitators and sponsorship of continuing medical education (CME) events, while individual-specific precedents had a negative relationship with intent to comply. Predictors of intent (R2 = 0.52, p <0) were attitude, subjective norms, the interaction term (attitude and subjective norms), sponsorship of CME events and individual-specific precedents.

Conclusions: Physicians are more likely to follow the AMA guidelines if they have positive attitudes towards the guidelines, greater subjective norms, fewer expectations of CME sponsorship and fewer individual-specific precedents. Physicians believing that important individuals or organisations expect them to comply with the guidelines are more likely to express intent, despite having fewer beliefs that positive outcomes would result through compliance.


Abbreviations: AMA, American Medical Association; CME, continuing medical education; OIG, Office of the Inspector General; PhRMA, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America; TRA, Theory of Reasoned Action







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.