JME

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Medical Ethics 2007;33:261-265; doi:10.1136/jme.2005.014423
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow erratum
Right arrow Correction (v33,p496)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sham, C O
Right arrow Articles by Wong, A Y C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sham, C O
Right arrow Articles by Wong, A Y C

CLINICAL ETHICS

Do-not-resuscitate decision: the attitudes of medical and non-medical students

C O Sham1, Y W Cheng1, K W Ho1, P H Lai1, L W Lo1, H L Wan1, C Y Wong1, Y N Yeung1, S H Yuen1, A Y C Wong2

1 University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2 Department of Anesthesiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

Correspondence to:
MrC O Sham
Flat 8B, Block 2, Julimount Garden, 8–12 Fu Kin Street, Shatin, Hong Kong; philipsham{at}hkusua.hku.hk Objectives: To study the attitudes of both medical and non-medical students towards the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decision in a university in Hong Kong, and the factors affecting their attitudes.

Methods: A questionnaire-based survey conducted in the campus of a university in Hong Kong. Preferences and priorities of participants on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in various situations and case scenarios, experience of death and dying, prior knowledge of DNR and basic demographic data were evaluated.

Results: A total of 766 students participated in the study. There were statistically significant differences in their DNR decisions in various situations between medical and non-medical students, clinical and preclinical students, and between students who had previously experienced death and dying and those who had not. A prior knowledge of DNR significantly affected DNR decision, although 66.4% of non-medical students and 18.7% of medical students had never heard of DNR. 74% of participants from both medical and non-medical fields considered the patient’s own wish as the most important factor that the healthcare team should consider when making DNR decisions. Family wishes might not be decisive on the choice of DNR.

Conclusions: Students in medical and non-medical fields held different views on DNR. A majority of participants considered the patient’s own wish as most important in DNR decisions. Family wishes were considered less important than the patient’s own wishes.


Abbreviations: CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; DNR, do-not-resuscitate







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.