JME

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Medical Ethics 2007;33:197-200; doi:10.1136/jme.2006.016931
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow erratum
Right arrow Correction (v33,p369)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Machado, C.
Right arrow Articles by Manero, J. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Machado, C.
Right arrow Articles by Manero, J. M

CLINICAL ETHICS

The concept of brain death did not evolve to benefit organ transplants

Calixto Machado1, Julius Kerein2, Yazmina Ferrer1, Liana Portela1, Maria de la C García1, José M Manero1

1 Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Havana, Cuba
2 New York University Medical Center, New York, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr C Machado
Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Apartado Postal 4268, Ciudad de La Habana 10400, Cuba; braind{at}infomed.sld.cu Although it is commonly believed that the concept of brain death (BD) was developed to benefit organ transplants, it evolved independently. Transplantation owed its development to advances in surgery and immunosuppressive treatment; BD owed its origin to the development of intensive care. The first autotransplant was achieved in the early 1900s, when studies of increased intracranial pressure causing respiratory arrest with preserved heartbeat were reported. Between 1902 and 1950, the BD concept was supported by the discovery of EEG, Crile’s definition of death, the use of EEG to demonstrate abolition of brain potentials after ischaemia, and Crafoord’s statement that death was due to cessation of blood flow. Transplantation saw the first xenotransplant in humans and the first unsuccessful kidney transplant from a cadaver. In the 1950s, circulatory arrest in coma was identified by angiography, and the death of the nervous system and coma dépassé were described. Murray performed the first successful kidney transplant. In the 1960s, the BD concept and organ transplants were instantly linked when the first kidney transplant using a brain-dead donor was performed; Schwab proposed to use EEG in BD; the Harvard Committee report and the Sydney Declaration appeared; the first successful kidney, lung and pancreas transplants using cadaveric (not brain-dead) donors were achieved; Barnard performed the first human heart transplant. This historical review demonstrates that the BD concept and organ transplantation arose separately and advanced in parallel, and only began to progress together in the late 1960s. Therefore, the BD concept did not evolve to benefit transplantation.


Abbreviations: BD, brain death; ICP, intracranial pressure




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Brain death and organ transplants
David W Evans
JME Online, 11 Apr 2007 [Full text]
The concept of brain death: Let us not ignore the context of its social reception
Miran Epstein
JME Online, 17 Apr 2007 [Full text]
A Non Sequitur
Michael Potts
JME Online, 1 May 2007 [Full text]
The concept of brain death did not evolve to benefit organ transplants: Author’s Response
Calixto Machado, et al.
JME Online, 12 Jun 2007 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics.